On 02/19/2013 01:10 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 02/18/2013 11:27 PM, C de-Avillez wrote: >> So ecrypts limits NAME_MAX. Indeed, running the perl snippet with $dir >> set to 142 works. > > OK I'll take the simple approach and skip those tests in that case. > Patch attached.
Hi Padraig, two places with the same check ... wouldn't it be nice to wrap it into a "require_name_max_" or even use "require_name_max_ 200"? Apart from that: +1 Have a nice day, Berny
