On 05/27/2013 03:04 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: > FYI, this avoids another 32-bit (small SIZE_MAX, actually) test failure:
+1 thanks
On 05/27/2013 03:04 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: > FYI, this avoids another 32-bit (small SIZE_MAX, actually) test failure:
+1 thanks