On 06/03/2013 02:35 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 06/03/2013 12:14 PM, Bernhard Voelker wrote: >> I'm not sure I understand the above. >> Did you mean >> s/missing/out/ >> s/tail/wait4lines_/ >> ? > > As a consequence of wait4lines waiting incorrectly on 'out', > the 'missing' file would be populated by the time tail(1) > gets to process it. I'll clarify the description.
Ah, yes, that's the consequence when the logic behind is already messed. > So I'll make this additional change: > > -rm out || framework_failure_ > +# Clear 'out' so that we can check its contents without races > +:>out || framework_failure_ +1 even better ;-) Thanks! Have a nice day, Berny
