On 07/18/2013 10:53 PM, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > Include the number of arguments which rm received in the "Remove all > arguments?" prompt. This is useful in the, presumably, common case > where the arguments were not provided by hand, but instead were the > result of various shell expansions. A simple, if somewhat contrived, > example (assuming rm is aliased to rm -I) could be > > rm * .o > > where the prompt "Remove all 120 arguments?" is more likely to make > the user catch the problem.
This makes sense. Though slightly awkward when n_file==1 it's an improvement. I'll apply soon. thanks! Pádraig.
