On 11/18/2013 07:40 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > On 11/18/2013 01:32 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: >> On 09/30/2013 03:06 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: >>> On 09/30/2013 02:23 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >>>> Did this ever make it upstream? >>> >>> No because every time I attempted I bumped into more unconsidered cases. >>> I do intend to upstream it though soon. > >> So I finally got some time to finish this off. It's now up to 45 patches >> which you can view/comment on at: >> https://github.com/pixelb/coreutils/compare/selinux-restorecon > >> I intend to squash those to around 5 or so, before pushing in the next >> couple of days.
I squashed to 2. The selinux.c module itself: http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=coreutils.git;a=commit;h=d8e27ab0 and the updates to the utils to use that: http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=coreutils.git;a=commit;h=7958a4a4 Unfortunately I needed 3 more that should have been in the first commit, to fix portability issues: http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=coreutils.git;a=commit;h=1e16de1d http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=coreutils.git;a=commit;h=7e39ef9f http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=coreutils.git;a=commit;h=142baf67 I had even checked 32 bit builds with CFLAGS=-m32 but hadn't rerun configure with that setting, thus masking the issue fixed by the last commit. thanks, Pádraig.
