On 29 November 2013 01:31, Erik Auerswald <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 12:49:19AM +1100, Hal Ashburner wrote:
> > ls filters by filename - leading dot -a -A or --ignore pattern
> > I have shell script that just shows directories by interposing `test`
> > between two calls to ls in a pipeline to give me ls like behavior. Ls
> > actually knows the filetype so I thought why not just filter on it in ls
> > given filtering is something ls does? I noted this was not a rejected
> > feature request and thought it might go well as a request accompanied by
> a
> > patch.
> >
> > --just
> > was the best switch I could think of to achieve this end. I could easily
> be
> > convinced there exists a better one. (--show-only? --showing?)
>
> I don't like '--just' because it does not tell what this is about. One
> might confuse it with something regarding (left- or right-) justification.
>

I don't like --just much either.



> How about --list-type? I'd say the name should contain 'type' and
> something to differentiate it from '--file-type'.
>

Sounds pretty reasonable.



> Anyway, ls --file-type | grep _might_ work most of the time, but would
> become difficult with e.g. spaces or newlines in a file name, thus I'd
> say this functionality looks useful.
>

Thanks.

Reply via email to