On 10/30/2014 03:44 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 10/30/2014 02:23 AM, Bernhard Voelker wrote: >> After all, I don't have a strong preference, so I'm probably >> okay with re-introducing duplicate remote file systems. > > I'm 50:50 too. In that case we should probably err > on the side of less code and edge cases. > I.E. not go with with patch.
A compromise would be to list the separate exports by default since this is what people are used to, and suppress them in --total mode to support showing the individual file systems which are available and to have an accurate total in that case. Pádraig.
