On 13/10/15 12:48, Pádraig Brady wrote: > -TERM con132x25 > -TERM con132x30 > -TERM con132x43 > -TERM con132x60 > -TERM con80x25 > -TERM con80x28 > -TERM con80x30 > -TERM con80x43 > -TERM con80x50 > -TERM con80x60 > +TERM con[0-9]*x[0-9]*
Going to tighten that to: +TERM con80x?? +TERM con132x?? I've not heard any objections about this, so will apply later. thanks, Pádraig.
