On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 04:42:25PM +0200, Antonio Diaz Diaz wrote: > Pádraig Brady wrote: > > Anyway the general point of this thread is that > > fixing this with options to each generator of xz is not practical. > > Either the default xz crc should be changed to crc32, > > or more likely busybox xz would gain crc64 support. > > Xz-utils and busybox are not the only xz implementations. Asking each xz > implementation to standardize on the same check type is as unpractical
Why do you think so? -- ldv
