> If you can write a benchmark where you write a simple .c program > that can access just basenames of files from an arbitrary directory > (or an enhancement to the find program), and show that your program > outperforms baseline find for your given use case, and where the > outperformance actually makes a difference to the overall usage pattern > (that is, your benchmark also shows that it was much more than 1% of
I guess that I can not really achieve the kind of software improvement which you would prefer. > the overall time spent on producing then stripping the prefix data), I am proposing only to reduce the influence of such a data transformation. > then it is worth patching find to provide that mode of operation > (and such proof belongs best on the findutils list). I am curious if any other developers (than me) or system testers care for this implementation detail around the topic “Better support for data processing with basenames”. https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?51506 Regards, Markus
