I saw the tests and patch for overflow. It makes sense. Thanks,
KOBAYASHI Takashi 2020年10月25日(日) 10:16 Pádraig Brady <p...@draigbrady.com>: > On 25/10/2020 14:16, Pádraig Brady wrote: > > On 25/10/2020 08:39, KOBAYASHI Takashi wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I wrote a little patch for nl(1). Could you merge this mainstream? > >> It reduces the line number with the "--line-increment(-i)" option and > >> negative value. The "--starting-line-number(-v)" option has been allowed > >> negative value but "-i" has not until now. It should be unified. > > > This makes sense for consistency. > > > > I'll also add another commit along the lines off the following, > > to only fail when we need to output the overflowed number, > > and add some tests around these limits. > > I'll apply the attached two patches later. > > thanks again, > Pádraig >
