On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 12:40 PM Jim Meyering <j...@meyering.net> wrote: ... > - I'm inclined to work like the openbsd cksum and accept invocations > like "cksum -a sha1x" and "cksum -a sha1b". Any objection?
Actually, I am now **disinclined** to implement this part. It'd make sense only if we were able to compute multiple checksums in a single invocation. Allowing that would require a fundamental redesign, which feels out of scope, at least initially.
