Pádraig Brady <[email protected]> writes: > Good test. > I'd tweak it (as shown below) though to reduce the timeout and memory. > We don't care about false positive timeouts, and 6M should both be enough > headroom, > and fillable within 0.5s on modern systems.
Sure. I thought the timeout could be lower too, but didn't know if it better to cater to old machines which might read slow. We can always increase it later, though. > Also we don't need /dev/full, only the more ubiquitous /dev/zero. Agreed. Pushed with your suggested changes, thanks! Collin
