> Am 24.01.2026 um 19:08 schrieb Collin Funk <[email protected]>: > > Most of the failures are because BeFS, which I assume you also used, > does not support hard links. I'll see if I can adjust the test suite for > that, but thankfully most of them aren't coreutils bugs. > > My idea was to add a function like this in init.cfg: > > supports_hardlinks_ () > { > require_built_ stat > > test $(stat -f -c %T .) != bfs > } Maybe better test directly for the feature, i.e. if creating hardlinks is supported? By that, skipping on other filesystems lacking hardlinks (vfat?) would automatically work as well. Have a nice day, Berny
- Re: coreutils-9.9.258-49... Bruno Haible via GNU coreutils General Discussion
- Re: coreutils-9.9.258-49... Bruno Haible via GNU coreutils General Discussion
- Re: coreutils-9.9.2... Bruno Haible via GNU coreutils General Discussion
- Re: coreutils-9.9.258-49... Bruno Haible via GNU coreutils General Discussion
- Re: coreutils-9.9.2... Pádraig Brady
- Re: coreutils-9... Bruno Haible via GNU coreutils General Discussion
- Re: coreutils-9.9.258-49... Bruno Haible via GNU coreutils General Discussion
- Re: coreutils-9.9.2... Collin Funk
- Re: coreutils-9... Bruno Haible via GNU coreutils General Discussion
- Re: coreuti... Collin Funk
- Re: cor... Bernhard Völker
- Re: cor... Pádraig Brady
- Re... Bruno Haible via GNU coreutils General Discussion
- Re: coreutils-9.9.2... Bruno Haible via GNU coreutils General Discussion
- Re: coreutils-9.9.258-49... Bruno Haible via GNU coreutils General Discussion
- Re: coreutils-9.9.258-49... Bruno Haible via GNU coreutils General Discussion
- Re: coreutils-9.9.2... Pádraig Brady
- Re: coreutils-9... Bruno Haible via GNU coreutils General Discussion
- Re: coreutils-9.9.258-49... Bruno Haible via GNU coreutils General Discussion
- Re: coreutils-9.9.258-49... Bruno Haible via GNU coreutils General Discussion
- Re: coreutils-9.9.2... Collin Funk
