> I expect to omit the "enumerated" (`ol`) type, at least initially and
> possibly indefinitely, awaiting demand. The reason is that man(7)
> documents are responsible for managing their own enumerators, and it
> will add complexity to drop the already explicitly specified list marks
> from page content so that the HTML renderer can supply them.
Since you are going to have .LS (of any type) not supply the
label (bullet, number, whatever), you can treat "enumerated"
and "itemized" the same. That is, any HTML list will have to
suppress the HTML renderer's default labels, because the
manuscript is expected to supply them for each item.
An example will help show how I'm thinking about this:
Manuscript:
.LS enumerated 1
.IP 1.
Item one.
.IP 2.
Item two.
.LE
HTML output:
<style>
:is(ol,ul).man {
list-style-type: none;
}
</style>
<ol compact class="man">
<li style="list-style-type:'1. '">
Item one.
<li style="list-style-type:'2. '">
Item two.
</ol>
