"H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]> writes: > On 2026-09-01 06:47, Pádraig Brady wrote: >> >> This dropped comparison of c_iflag. >> Also the parity bit wasn't included in the number of bits. >> Also baud_to_value() is not guaranteed to match and can return ULONG_MAX. >> >> Is it ok to merge the attached changes into your patch? >> > Look OK to me. Thanks for catching that; especially the c_iflag part (the rest > is probably less critical, but still wrong.)
Thanks for the patch. And Pádraig, I agree with your adjustments. Collin
