Il giorno ven 12 ago 2022 alle 14:00 <[email protected]> ha
scritto:

> Send Corpora mailing list submissions to
>         [email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via email, send a message with subject or
> body 'help' to
>         [email protected]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         [email protected]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Corpora digest..."
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. [CfP] TREC Health Misinformation Track 2022 (Maria Maistro)
>    2. [CfP] ACM TOIS Efficiency in Neural IR (Maria Maistro)
>    3. Call for Badges - ACM SIGIR Artifact Badges Continuous Submission
>       (Nicola Ferro)
>    4. Call for proposals: Natural Language Processing (John Benjamin’s)
>       (Caro)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 08:03:18 +0000
> From: Maria Maistro <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Corpora-List] [CfP] TREC Health Misinformation Track 2022
> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>         boundary="_000_86B5F7089063456AB790888B9639E00Fkudk_"
>
> Call for Participation - TREC Health Misinformation Track 2022
> https://trec-health-misinfo.github.io
>
> Overview 🧐
> --------------------------
> Web search engines are frequently used to help people make decisions about
> health-related issues. Unfortunately, the web is filled with misinformation
> regarding the efficacy of treatments for health issues. Search users may
> not be able to discern correct from incorrect information, nor credible
> from non-credible sources. As a result of finding misinformation deemed by
> the user to be useful to their decision making task, they can make
> incorrect decisions that waste money and put their health at risk.
>
> The TREC Health Misinformation track fosters research on retrieval methods
> that promote reliable and correct information over misinformation for
> health-related decision making tasks.
>
> Tasks 💼
> --------------------------
> * Ad-hoc Retrieval Task: design a ranking model that promotes credible and
> correct information over incorrect information;
> * Answer Prediction Task: predict the answer to the topic’s stance.
>
> Guidelines 📋 we u guy
> --------------------------
> * Corpus: noclean version of the C4 dataset (
> https://huggingface.co/datasets/allenai/c4);
> * Topics: about consumer health search (people seeking health advice
> online);
> * Runs: runs may be either automatic or manual with the standard TREC run
> format.
>
> Detailed guidelines: https://trec-health-misinfo.github.io
>
> Important Dates 🔥
> --------------------------
> * Runs due from participants: August 28, 2022
> * Evaluation results returned: End of September 2022
> * Notebook paper due: October 2022
> * TREC 2022 Conference: November 14-18, 2022
> * Final paper due: February 2023
>
> Organization 👔
> --------------------------
> * Charles Clarke, University of Waterloo
> * Maria Maistro, University of Copenhagen
> * Mark Smucker, University of Waterloo
>
>
> ———
>
> Maria Maistro, PhD
> Tenure-track Assistant Professor
> Department of Computer Science
> University of Copenhagen
> Universitetsparken 5, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
> -------------- next part --------------
> A message part incompatible with plain text digests has been removed ...
> Name: not available
> Type: text/html
> Size: 3101 bytes
> Desc: not available
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 08:07:34 +0000
> From: Maria Maistro <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Corpora-List] [CfP] ACM TOIS Efficiency in Neural IR
> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>         boundary="_000_3D36AF0DFA6D4A4FBE65DF108B703AD2kudk_"
>
> Call for Papers - ACM Transactions on Information Systems
> Special Section on Efficiency in Neural Information Retrieval
>
> Full Call of Papers: https://dl.acm.org/journal/tois/calls-for-papers
>
> Overview 🧐
> --------------------------
> The aim of this Special Section is to engage with researchers in
> Information Retrieval, Natural Language Processing, and related areas and
> gather insight into the core challenges in measuring, reporting, and
> optimizing all facets of efficiency in Neural Information Retrieval (NIR)
> systems, including time-, space-, resource-, sample- and energy-
> efficiency, among other factors.
> This special section solicits perspectives from active researchers to
> advance our understanding of and to overcome efficiency challenges in NIR.
> In particular, researchers are encouraged to examine the ever-growing
> model complexity through appropriate empirical analysis, to propose models
> that require less data, computational resources, and energy for training
> and fine-tuning with similarly efficient inference, to ask if there are
> meaningful simplifications of the existing training processes or model
> architectures that lead to comparable quality, and explore a multi-faceted
> evaluation of NIR models from quality to all dimensions of efficiency with
> standardized metrics.
>
> Topics 🔍
> --------------------------
> We welcome submissions on the following topics, including but not limited
> to:
> * Novel NIR models that reach competitive quality but are designed to
> provide efficient training or
> inference;
> * Efficient NIR models for decentralized IR tasks such as conversational
> search;
> * Efficient NIR models for IR-related tasks such as question answering and
> recommender systems;
> * Efficient NIR for resource-constrained devices;
> * Scalability of NIR systems;
> * Efficient NIR for text and cross-modal search;
> * Strategies to optimize training or inference of existing NIR models;
> * Sample-efficient training of NIR models;
> * Efficiency-driven distillation, pruning, quantization, retraining, and
> transfer learning;
> * Empirical investigation of the complexity of existing NIR models through
> an analysis of quality, interpretability, robustness, and environmental
> impact;
> * Evaluation protocols for efficiency in NIR.
>
> Important Dates 🔥
> --------------------------
> * Open for Submissions: Aug 1, 2022
> * Submissions deadline: Dec 31, 2022
> * First-round review decisions: Mar 31, 2023
> * Deadline for minor revision submissions: Apr 30, 2023
> * Deadline for major revision submissions: Jun 30, 2023
> * Notification of final decisions: Jul 31, 2023
> * Tentative publication: 2023
>
> Guest Editors 📚
> --------------------------
> * Dr. Sebastian Bruch, Pinecone, United States of America
> * Prof. Claudio Lucchese, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Italy
> * Dr. Maria Maistro, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
> * Dr. Franco Maria Nardini, ISTI-CNR, Italy
>
>
> ———
> Maria Maistro, PhD
> Tenure-track Assistant Professor
> Department of Computer Science
> University of Copenhagen
> Universitetsparken 5, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
> -------------- next part --------------
> A message part incompatible with plain text digests has been removed ...
> Name: not available
> Type: text/html
> Size: 4100 bytes
> Desc: not available
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 10:55:54 +0200
> From: Nicola Ferro <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Corpora-List] Call for Badges - ACM SIGIR Artifact Badges
>         Continuous Submission
> To: [email protected]
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>         boundary="Apple-Mail=_92A380A6-3258-4B5B-A5DD-8556CDC7BDE2"
>
> ## ACM SIGIR Artifact Badges ##
>
> The ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval (SIGIR) adheres to
> and implements the ACM policies for "Artifact Review and Badging” (
> https://www.acm.org/publications/policies/artifact-review-and-badging-current
> <
> https://www.acm.org/publications/policies/artifact-review-and-badging-current>).
>
>
> Artifact badging is not only intended for further improving our
> experimental practices, but especially to highlight and recognize the
> outstanding efforts made by those who go the extra mile to make their
> experiments’ code and data not only available online, but also easy to use,
> fully functional, and reproducible.
>
> Overall, the initiative promotes reproducibility of research results and
> allows scientists and practitioners to immediately benefit from
> state-of-the-art research results, without spending months re-implementing
> the proposed algorithms and trying to find the right parameter values, or
> creating datasets or running intensive user-oriented evaluation. We also
> hope that it will indirectly foster scientific progress, since it allows
> researchers to reliably compare with and build upon existing techniques,
> knowing that they are using exactly the same implementation.
>
> Badge Types:
>
> ** Artifacts Evaluated – Functional ** The artifacts associated with the
> research are found to be documented, consistent, complete, exercisable, and
> include appropriate evidence of verification and validation.
>
> ** Artifacts Evaluated – Reusable and Available ** The artifacts
> associated with the paper are of a quality that significantly exceeds
> minimal functionality. That is, they have all the qualities of the
> Artifacts Evaluated – Functional level, but, in addition, they are very
> carefully documented and well-structured to the extent that reuse and
> repurposing are facilitated. In particular, the norms and standards of the
> research community for artifacts of this type are strictly adhered to. This
> badge is applied to papers in which associated artifacts have been made
> permanently available for retrieval.
>
> ** Results Reproduced ** The main results of the paper have been obtained
> in a subsequent study by a person or team other than the authors, using, in
> part, artifacts provided by the author.
>
> ** Results Replicated ** The main results of the paper have been
> independently obtained in a subsequent study by a person or team other than
> the authors, without the use of author-supplied artifacts
>
> The different types of ACM stamps are not meant to be a measure of the
> scientific quality of the paper themselves or of the usefulness of
> presented algorithms, which are assessed by means of the traditional
> peer-review processes and by adoption/impact in the research and industry
> community. Rather, they are a recognition of the service provided by
> authors to the community by releasing the code and/or data and they are an
> endorsement of the replicability and/or reproducibility of the results
> presented in the paper. The stamps also alert users of the ACM Digital
> Library about the presence and location of these artifacts in the ACM DL:
>
> Datasets – https://dl.acm.org/artifacts/dataset <
> https://dl.acm.org/artifacts/dataset>
> Software – https://dl.acm.org/artifacts/software <
> https://dl.acm.org/artifacts/software>
>
> In this way, each artifact will be assigned its own DOI, will be directly
> citable, and will be linked to its corresponding paper.
>
>
> ## Artifact Submission ##
>
> ACM SIGIR Artifact Badges applies to artifacts complementing papers
> accepted in one of the following venues:
>
> ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS)
> Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in
> Information Retrieval (SIGIR)
> ACM on Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (CHIIR)
> ACM SIGIR International Conference on the Theory of Information Retrieval
> (ICTIR)
>
> The submission is always open and authors are welcome to apply for badges
> as soon as their papers get accepted in one of the above venues.
>
> Irrespective of the nature of the artifacts, authors should create a
> single Web page (whether on their site or a third-party repository service)
> that contains the artifact, the paper, and all necessary instructions.
>
> For artifacts where this would be appropriate, it would be helpful to also
> provide a self-contained bundle (including instructions) as a single file
> (.tgz or .zip) for convenient offline use.
>
> The artifact submission thus consists of just the URL and any credentials
> required to access the files submitted into the submission system:
>
> https://openreview.net/group?id=ACM.org/SIGIR/Badging <
> https://openreview.net/group?id=ACM.org/SIGIR/Badging>
>
>
> ## Artifact Preparation Guidelines and Review Procedure ##
>
> You can find more information about the ACM SIGIR Artifact Badges at:
>
> https://sigir.org/general-information/acm-sigir-artifact-badging/ <
> https://sigir.org/general-information/acm-sigir-artifact-badging/>
>
> There you can also find detailed instructions and suggestions about how to
> prepare your artifacts for each type of badge and the reviewing criteria
> for each of them.
>
> Each artifact will be reviewed by a senior and junior member of the
> Artifact Evaluation Committee (AEC).
>
> For any questions or clarifications, please contact us at:
>
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>
>
> ## ACM SIGIR Artifact Evaluation Committee (AEC) ##
>
> Chair and Vice-chair
> Nicola Ferro, University of Padua, Italy [chair]
> Johanne Trippas, RMIT University , Australia [vice-chair]
>
> Senior Members
> Alessandro Benedetti, Sease, UK
> Rob Capra, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA
> Diego Ceccarelli, Bloomberg, UK
> Anita Crescenzi, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA
> Charles L . A. Clarke, University of Waterloo, Canada
> Yi Fang, Santa Clara University, USA
> Norbert Fuhr, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
> Claudia Hauff, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands
> Jiqun Liu, University of Oklahoma, USA
> Maria Maistro, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
> Miguel Martinez, Signal AI, UK
> Parth Mehta, Parmonic, USA
> Martin Potthast, Leipzig University, Germany
> Tetsuya Sakai, Waseda University, Japan
> Ian Soboroff, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), USA
> Paul Thomas, Microsoft, Australia
> Andrew Trotman, University of Otago, New Zealand
> Min Zhang, Tsinghua University, China
>
> Junior Members
> Valeriia Baranova, RMIT University, Australia
> Arthur Barbosa Câmara, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands
> Hamed Bonab, University of Massachusetts Amherst, USA
> Kathy Brennan, Google, USA
> Timo Breuer, TH Köln, Germany
> Guglielmo Faggioli, University of Padua, Italy
> Alexander Frummet, University of Regensburg, Germany
> Darío Garigliotti, Aalborg University, Denmark
> Chris Kamphuis, Radboud University, The Netherlands
> Johannes Kiesel, Bauhaus-Universität Weimar, Germany
> Yuan Li, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA
> Joel Mackenzie, University of Melbourne, Australia
> Antonio Mallia, New York University, USA
> David Maxwell, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands
> Felipe Moraes, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands
> Ahmed Mourad, University of Queensland, Australia
> Zuzana Pinkosova, ‎University of Strathclyde, UK
> Chen Qu, University of Massachusetts Amherst, USA
> Anna Ruggero, Sease, UK
> Svitlana Vakulenko, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
> Sasha Vtyurina, KIRA systems, Canada
> Oleg Zendel, RMIT University, Australia
> Steven Zimmerman, University of Essex, UK
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A message part incompatible with plain text digests has been removed ...
> Name: not available
> Type: text/html
> Size: 10601 bytes
> Desc: not available
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 09:11:31 +0000
> From: Caro Quintana, Rocío I. <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Corpora-List] Call for proposals: Natural Language
>         Processing (John Benjamin’s)
> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Message-ID:  <[email protected]
>         P265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;    boundary="_000_CWXP265MB3831A7
>         312B9578FE45975DC196679CWXP265MB3831GBRP_"
>
>
> Natural Language Processing (John Benjamin’s)
>
> Call for Book Proposals
>
>
> John Benjamins' NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING Book Series invites new book
> proposals to respond to the growing demand for Natural Language processing
> (NLP) literature. Three general types of books are considered for
> publication:
>
> Monographs - featuring (i) original leading cutting-edge research (the
> monograph could be based on an outstanding PhD thesis), or (ii) surveys of
> the state-of-the art of specific NLP tasks or applications.
>
> Collections – (i) books focusing on a particular NLP area (e.g. emerging
> from successful NLP workshops or as a result of editors’ calls for papers)
> or (ii) books which include papers covering a wide range of topics (e.g.
> emerging from competitive NLP conferences or as a result of proposals for
> books of the type “Reading In NLP”).
>
> Course books – (i) general NLP course books or (ii) course books on a
> particular key area of NLP (e.g. Speech Processing, Computational
> Syntax/Parsing).
>
> Authors will be encouraged to append supplementary materials such as
> demonstration programs, NLP software, corpora etc. and to indicate
> websites, computational language resources etc. where appropriate.
>
> This call invites proposals from potential authors of the types of books
> described above. Proposals on any topic related to Natural Language
> Processing are welcome.
>
> Topics
>
> The scope of the series is comprehensive ranging from theoretical
> Computational Linguistics topics (Computational Syntax, Computational
> Semantics etc.) to highly practical Language Technology topics (speech
> recognition, information extrac­tion, information retrieval etc.). The
> series covers both written language and speech; it welcomes works covering
> (but not limited to) areas such as: phonology, morphology, syntax,
> semantics, discourse, pragmatics, dialogue, text understanding and
> generation, machine translation, machine-aided translation, translation
> aids and tools, corpus-based language processing; written and spoken
> natural language interfaces, knowledge ac­quisition, information
> extraction, text summarisation, text classification, computer-aided
> language learning, language resources.
>
> New results in NLP based on modern alternative theories and methodologies
> as opposed to the mainstream techniques of symbolic NLP such as
> analogy-based, statistical, connections as well as hybrid and multimedia
> approaches, will be also welcome.
>
> Advisory board
>
> The new series’ editor is Ruslan Mitkov (University of Wolverhampton) and
> the advisory board of the series includes:
>
> - Eduardo Blanco (University of North Texas)
> - Gloria Corpas (University of Malaga)
> - Robert Dale (Macquarie University)
> - Elizaveta Goncharova (National Research University)
> - Veronique Hoste (Veronique Hoste)
> - Eduard Hovy (Carnegie Mellon University)
> - Lori Lamel (The Computer Sciences Laboratory for Mechanics and
> Engineering Sciences)
> - Carlos Martín-Vide (Rovira i Virgili University)
> - Johanna Monti (University of Naples "L'Orientale" )
> - Roberto Navigli (Sapienza University of Rome)
> - Nicolas Nicolov (AI/ML, Avalara Inc.)
> - Constantin Orasan (University of Surrey)
> - Paolo Rosso (Universitat Politècnica de València)
> - Raheem Sarwar (University of Wolverhampton)
> - Khalil Sima’an (University of Amsterdam)
> - Richard Sproat (Google Research)
> - Key-Yih Su (Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica)
>
> The managing editor at John Benjamins is Kees Vaes (Email
> [email protected]).
>
> Submission of proposals
>
> Interested authors should submit proposals by email (plain text or pdf
> files) to the series editor:
> Prof. Dr. Ruslan Mitkov
> Email [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> with a copy to Ms Rocío Caro Quintana ([email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>), Editorial Assistant.
>
> The proposals should include an outline of the book (1-2 pages), a
> preliminary table of contents, the target readership, related publications,
> how the book will differ from other similar books in the area (if
> applicable), time-scale and information about the prospective author
> (relevant experience in the field, publications etc.).
>
> Each proposal will be reviewed by members of the advisory board or
> additional reviewers.
>
> More information
>
> More information at Natural Language Processing (benjamins.com)<
> https://benjamins.com/catalog/nlp>.
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A message part incompatible with plain text digests has been removed ...
> Name: not available
> Type: text/html
> Size: 17268 bytes
> Desc: not available
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> Corpora mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of Corpora Digest, Vol 219, Issue 1
> ***************************************
>
-- 

R Tr
_______________________________________________
Corpora mailing list -- [email protected]
https://list.elra.info/mailman3/postorius/lists/corpora.list.elra.info/
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to