CFP: “The times they are a-changin’” in Digital Humanities – a mini-conference 
on the temporal dimension of data 

Date: July 15th (DH2025 Pre-Conference Program)  

Digital Humanities Conference “Accessibility and Citizenship” 2025, 14 - 18 
July 2025, Lisbon, Portugal 

Digital Humanities (DH) methods have advanced significantly in recent decades. 
However, several blind spots still persist across the field, the insufficient 
attention to temporal dynamics in data being one of them.  

Temporal change plays an integral role in a number of disciplines within DH, 
affecting data, methodology, analyses, and the field itself (Glawion et al., 
2025). Digital art history, especially provenance research, is challenged by 
changing or missing object information, such as varying titles (Kim, 2015) or 
attributions (Hofbauer, 2021), complicating access and tracing their 
(ownership) history over time and space. In geographical studies on mobility, 
this movement in space and time is mediated by practices of sense-making 
changing slowly over time (Creswell, 2010). Discourse analysis examines time 
frames around key public events that set specific communicative strategies in 
motion (Islentyeva, 2022), corpus-based studies employ quantitative linguistic 
analyses to generate meaningful time periods for studying linguistic change 
(e.g., Gries & Hilpert, 2008), and studies of register, text varieties 
associated with the situation of use (Biber & Conrad, 2019), are beginning to 
examine emergence and evolution of registers as cultural constructs (Gracheva 
et al., forthcoming). Digital Literary Studies raise questions about cultural 
evolution (Sobchuk, 2023), genre history (Wagner-Egelhaaf, 2014) and editorial 
histories of literary works (Bottigheimer, 1987) on the level of texts, the 
evolution of authorial style over the course of an author’s life (Piper, 2018) 
and different types of time-series data such as eye movements and EEG data in 
empirical studies of reader-response (Dimigen et al., 2011; Weitin et al., 
2024). 

We particularly invite proposals that relate to the theme of temporal change, 
including but not limited to the following questions: How should we address 
temporal change methodologically in DH? What role should visualizations play? 
Are time periods implemented to categorize data from the start (top-down), or 
are they the result of data-driven classification (bottom-up)? And how can we 
ensure that project data remains FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, 
Reusable) across disciplines long after the project concludes? 

Target audience: The mini-conference welcomes researchers from all career 
stages from diverse disciplines and backgrounds who are engaged with the 
temporal dimensions of data. We encourage submissions from those involved in 
DH, data analysis, historical studies, linguistic and literary research, art 
history, geo-spatial studies and related fields.  

Submission types: The mini-conference invites submissions of finalized projects 
or work-in-progress reports on theoretical or methodological reflections, 
empirical studies, and/or practical applications on the topic of time in DH (15 
min. + 15 min. discussions). Submissions can focus on but are not limited to 
the domains of “images & objects”, “text & language” and “place & space”. 

Submission format and deadline: Submissions should include a presentation 
title, the presenter’s affiliation, and an abstract of max. 250 words 
(bibliography excluded). Please send your submission as a single PDF file to 
[email protected]. The submission deadline is April 10, 2025; acceptance 
notifications will be sent out by April 30, 2025.  

For questions, please contact [email protected] . 

Bibliography 

    Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2019). Register, genre, and style. Cambridge 
University Press.  

    Bottigheimer, R. B. (1987). Silenced women in the Grimm’s tales: The 'fit' 
between fairy tales and society in their historical context. In R. B. 
Bottigheimer (Ed.), Fairy tales and society: Illusion, allusion, and paradigm 
(pp. 115–133). University of Pennsylvania Press. 
https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812201505   

    Cresswell, T. (2010). Towards a politics of mobility. Environment and 
Planning D: Society and Space, 28(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1068/d11407 

    Dimigen, O., Sommer, W., Hohlfeld, A., Jacobs, A. M., & Kliegl, R. (2011). 
Coregistration of eye movements and EEG in natural reading: Analyses and 
review. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(4), 552–572. 
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023885 

    Glawion, A., Kremer, D., Lang, S., Mahlberg, M., & Wagner, A. (2025). 
Applied digital humanities: Calling for a more engaged digital humanities. In 
Digital Humanities im deutschsprachigen Raum (DHd), Bielefeld, Book of 
Abstracts (pp. 298–301). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14942990  

    Gracheva, M., Keller, D., & Egbert, J. (forthcoming). Evolution of 
registers as cultural constructs: The case of blogs.  

    Gries, S. Th., & Hilpert, M. (2008). The identification of stages in 
diachronic data: Variability-based neighbor clustering. Corpora, 3(1), 59–81. 
https://doi.org/10.3366/E1749503208000075  

    Hofbauer, M. (2021). Cranach: Parerga und Paralipomena: Neues zu Lucas 
Cranach und seinen Söhnen. arthistoricum.net. 
https://doi.org/10.11588/arthistoricum.722  

    Islentyeva, A. (2022). British media representations of EU migrants before 
and after the EU referendum. CADAAD Journal, 14(2), 1–20. 
https://doi.org/10.21827/cadaad.14.2.41617  

    Kim, S. (2015). Bildtitel: Eine Kunstgeschichte des Bildtitels. Kovač.  

    Piper, A. (2018). Enumerations: Data and literary study. University of 
Chicago Press.  

    Sobchuk, O. (2023). Evolution of modern literature and film. In J. J. 
Tehrani, J. Kendal, & R. Kendal (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cultural 
evolution (1st ed.). Oxford University Press. 
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198869252.013.45  

    Wagner-Egelhaaf, M. (2014). Literaturgeschichte als operative Fiktion. In 
M. Buschmeier (Ed.), Literaturgeschichte: Theorien - Modelle - Praktiken. 
Studien und Texte zur Sozialgeschichte der Literatur (Vol. 138, pp. 86–101). 
http://d-nb.info/1032799404/04  

    Weitin, T., Fabian, T., Glawion, A., Brottrager, J., & Pilz, Z. (2024). Is 
bad fiction processed differently by the human brain? An electrophysiological 
study on reading experience. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 17, Article 
1333965. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1333965
_______________________________________________
Corpora mailing list -- [email protected]
https://list.elra.info/mailman3/postorius/lists/corpora.list.elra.info/
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to