This represents a fast read through and not a hard review. Section 1 - bullet point 2 - I think that the reference to X.1520 is in the wrong place
Section 2 - the change of the naming scheme seems to be gratuitous. You need to justify it if you are going to keep it. Section 3 - why are you wrapping a hash in a bstr rather than leaving it as an array? Section 4 - you have the protected and unprotected header restrictions backwards Jim _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
