We've gotten enough questions on this that I'm thinking the best course of action is to make a change and put it back through last call. The change could be to make the reference normative and wait on the publication of CDDL (in the editors queue) or to fully specify the format in this draft.
I'll wait until a little before 10 in hopes we get some more discussion. Thank you, Kathleen Please excuse typos, sent from handheld device > On Sep 28, 2016, at 6:20 PM, Alexey Melnikov <[email protected]> wrote: > > Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-cose-msg-19: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-msg/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Stephen, I've seen several documents recently that "reference CDDL > informatively" and I don't believe that. So the whole situation with CDDL > makes me rather unhappy. > > Comments on the document: > > This is a well written document, despite its length. Thank you for that. > > Some specific comments: > > I am pretty sure that the CDDL reference is normative. > > On page 13: media type syntax reference is outdated, you should reference > RFC 6838, Section 4.2 has relevant ABNF. > > In Media type registrations: > > Applications that use this media type: To be identified > > This answer is not useful, please specify types of applications that will > be using these media types. Something along the lines of what you > specified in the Introduction. > > _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
