I reported it, so yes I believe that this should be approved. Jim
-----Original Message----- From: RFC Errata System [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 11:03 AM To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8152 (5066) The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8152, "CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5066 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Jim Schaad <[email protected]> Section: 14 Original Text ------------- o The restriction applies to the encoding of the Sig_structure, the Enc_structure, and the MAC_structure. Corrected Text -------------- o The restriction applies to the encoding of the COSE_KDF_Context, Sig_structure, the Enc_structure, and the MAC_structure. Notes ----- When listing the set of structure that need to be canonically encoded, I missed this one. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC8152 (draft-ietf-cose-msg-24) -------------------------------------- Title : CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE) Publication Date : July 2017 Author(s) : J. Schaad Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : CBOR Object Signing and Encryption Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
