Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-cose-01-00: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-cose/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- % Key management and binding of keys to identities are out of scope for % the working group. The COSE WG will not innovate in terms of % cryptography. The specification of algorithms in COSE is limited to % those in RFCs or active IETF WG documents. should probably include RG documents, too. Are all the TPM-implemented algorithms in question going to meet this restriction? For the deliverable "5. Define a small set of hash functions" the text should be more clear about what constraints are placed on the design of these hash functions (the rest of the text would have me think that they are essentially for "certificate thumbprints" but that's just a guess). _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
