Hi, Eric, On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 8:37 AM Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 9:30 PM Adam Roach <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 10/24/18 8:50 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote: >> > I think there's just some process confusion. I didn't explicitly send >> > it to external review. Maybe I just agreed on the call and forgot? >> >> >> It went to external review: >> >> >> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/HLFfvE8H2WRtwIqgiz4c2BHr7_g > > > Yes, I understand that. What I'm saying is that AFAIK I didn't press a > button to make it happen, which is why I didn't update it per comments. > So, looking at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-cose/history/, it looks like Cindy pushed that button, which is why you didn't see it happen, but I think the meta-point is that we probably should have had it Approved/AD Follow-up, or something like that. Because it was just Approved with no substate, that would go out mechanically, if not automatically. I THINK. Good question for Robert or someone else who understands the substates better than I do. (None of us process THAT many charter updates!) So somehow, that step was missed, which would have put it in Eric's AD dashboard for follow-up, like all the other documents we approve pending edits. And I'm guessing here, too. Some of you guys do code sprints on the datatracker - can anyone comment? Spencer > > > >> > I am happy to make these changes now or can make them and send it back >> > or whatever.... >> >> >> Given that the external review doesn't end until after the telechat, I >> don't think we can approve it on the call tomorrow. Perhaps add it as an >> administrative item to one of the in-person meetings in Bangkok? >> > > WFM. > > -Ekr > > >> /a >> >>
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
