I support this as I believe it spurred from some messages from me to Jim. Thank you for starting the work.
Best regards, Kathleen Sent from my mobile device > On Feb 25, 2019, at 7:38 PM, Jim Schaad <[email protected]> wrote: > > A version of what this document would look like can be found here > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-schaad-cose-hash-algs-01 > > Jim > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: COSE <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Matthew A. Miller >> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2019 4:16 PM >> To: cose <[email protected]> >> Subject: [COSE] Call for Consensus: Standalone Hash Algorithms Document >> >> This messages starts a call for consensus to separate the COSE hash >> algorithms into a separate document, ending on 2018-03-10. >> >> In the virtual interim on 02-15, it was proposed to separate them from draft- >> ietf-cose-x509, to allow the hash algorithm registrations to stabilize more >> quickly than the rest of the X.509 draft. If the working group agrees with >> separating the algorithms, then a document will be published that consists of >> Section 4 (Hash Algorithm Identifiers) and Section 5.3 (COSE Algorithm >> Registry) from draft-ietf-cose-x509. >> >> Please respond with whether or not you support separating the hash >> algorithms into a separate document. If you do not support this, please >> indicate why not. >> >> >> - Ivaylo and Matthew >> COSE Chairs > > > _______________________________________________ > COSE mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
