On Nov 22, 2019, at 06:27, John Mattsson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Could we replace "data origination" with "non-repudiation"?
Preferably not. If you want the thing that often is identified incorrectly by the latter, please use a more precise term such as “third party verifiability”. Non-repudation is a legal term. Provenance is often a term used for the former. BTW, the text might be easier to read when constructs such as “bistro”, oops, “bstr”, are replaced by “byte string” outside of the CDDL (where byte strings are indeed called “buster”, oops, “bstr”, or also simply “bytes”). In the previous sentence, for demonstration, I left in the autocorrects as they actually happened :-) Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
