Thanks for the response, Jim, and your counter-suggestions all look good. I appreciate your considering my comments.
On this: > Might it be better to have the new column be called “cryptographic use”, > with values of “yes” and “no”? Hint: I think it would. Hint#2: this is a > non-blocking comment, so you might disagree. [JLS] I did think about this, the issue is that I do not know what the correct value would be to place in that column for "AES-GCM-128". The table has things which are not hash algorithms. You couldn’t say “yes” to “cryptographic use” for AES-GCM-128? Why would “Recommend” “yes” be better? I kind of feel (though not that strongly, so I’ll let this be my last comment on it unless you want to continue to chat about it) that “Recommend” is an odd column heading. The name raises a question for me about why the entry would be there if it’s not Recommended. b
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
