Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-cose-rfc8152bis-algs-09: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-rfc8152bis-algs/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for the work on this document. To be honest, I had only time to quickly browse through: I am trusting the security AD for the security considerations. Not really important but I wonder why the security considerations are spread through all the document (sections 3.1.1, 3.2.1, ...). It obviously makes the text clearer and easier to read but may I suggest to rename those sections in something more specific (to avoid the comparaison with the well-know security considerations section of all I-D -- that is Section 11 in this document) : e.g., "Section 4.2.1 Security Considerations of AES CCM". I noted that this is used in "6.2.1. Security Considerations for AES-KW" already, just be consistent ;-) Hope this helps -éric _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
