On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 06:36:57PM -0700, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 6:06 PM Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for > > draft-ietf-cose-hash-algs-06: No Objection > > > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-hash-algs/ > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > COMMENT: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Thanks for the past and pending updates to address my Discuss point. > > A few new comments on the -06: > > [...] > > > > I take "pending" to mean I should expect an -07 before approving this? > > Assuming "yes", I'm going to mark it as "Revised I-D Needed" now, but > please tell me if I'm misunderstanding.
Your understanding is correct. See https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/KvoH-c1DXhfL_Jg_qxuY_IeTSL8/ and my comment on section 3.3 (we still have text that claims that a shorter SHAKE output is not a prefix of a longer SHAKE output, which is false). -Ben _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
