Jim Schaad <[email protected]> wrote:
    >> -----Original Message-----
    >> From: COSE <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Michael Richardson
    >> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2020 1:30 PM
    >> To: [email protected]; Mike Jones <[email protected]>
    >> Subject: [COSE] implementations of RFC8152
    >>
    >>
    >> Hi,
    >>
    >> Is the WG aware of any formal (cryptographic) reviews of RFC7515 and
    >> RFC8152?

    > [JLS] I am not too sure of what you mean by a cryptographic review, but I
    > suspect that the answer is no.  There have been some community reviews of
    > RFC 7515 which point to issues that need to be kept in mind, such as the
    > existence of the None signature algorithm.  I don't remember seeing 
anything
    > for RFC 8152 which was not along the lines of - it must have the same 
issues
    > as RFC 7515.

Sorry, I used impresise language because I was tired and frustrated at the
time.

I'm asking about formal verifications, either at the protocol interaction
level, such as was done for IKE recently:
   https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/LNEPxxRwNAeWbp2Cjzqb-uS7-No/

and has been planned for EDHOC:
   https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lake/WGmpD4F9Yb6qCfgwYkF0oKcEqYw

which I know has been done for TLS.

    >> Was there an implementation report when 8152 was published?

    > [JLS] Yes there was.

I looked back through the IDs before RFC, since we usually remove that before
publication, but I didn't see it in the ID.  I guess it might be in the
shepherd write up...  Yup.
I wish we would get on with having this on the rfc-editor.org pages :-)

    >> While I'm aware of many of the IETF efforts that leverage COSE, is there
    > > any
    >> data on how it has been used outside of the IETF?

    > [JLS] There are a couple of different projects at the W3C.  Web
    > Authentication is one and Secure Data Storage is another.
    > There is an ISO
    > driving license standard that I have see reference (ISO/IEC JTC 001/SC 17
    > "Cards and security devices for personal identification" Mobile Driver's
    > License (mDL)).   A couple of people have talked to me about potentially
    > using COSE rather than CMS but needing certificates to do so.  I can't
    > remember who off the top of my head.

Thank you.
Is it worth enabling a wiki in https://github.com/cose-wg somewhere to record
these things?

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        |    IoT architect   [
]     [email protected]  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
COSE mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose

Reply via email to