Carsten:
> 
> So here is my revised proposed plan for handling countersignature:
> 
> — remove countersignature from -struct
> — point out that RFC 8152 defines a form of countersignatures with known 
> (described) drawbacks; this is still registered, so not going away
> - point out that draft-ietf-… defines an updated form of countersignatures
> - write draft-ietf-… (well, get that adopted swiftly), pursue early 
> registration
> - progress -struct to IS as planned.
> 
I think the reasons you gave for keeping the discussion all in the same 
document are compelling.

Russ

_______________________________________________
COSE mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose

Reply via email to