Since -algs is Informational either way, it's not clear that it would depend on whether -struct is PS or IS. (Right?)
-Ben On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 04:05:18PM -0400, Barry Leiba wrote: > Ack; thanks. > I had been holding algs in wait for struct. Should I go ahead and > send algs up, even if struct needs more work... and even if it needs > to stay at PS? > > b > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 11:35 AM Jim Schaad <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Barry, > > > > I have just done a read through on draft-ietf-cose-rfc8152bis-algs looking > > for potential conflicts with the changes in the Countersignature issue. I > > did not find any issues that should hold up the document from being pushed > > to the RFC Editor. > > > > Jim > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > COSE mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
