Having no objections, we'll proceed with the previously proposed actions. Jim, at your convenience, please publish the indicated changes to -rfc8152bis-struct. Also please submit the countersignatures v2 document as a working group document.
Thank you all, -Ivaylo and Matthew COSE WG Chairs > On Aug 26, 2020, at 13:58, Matthew A. Miller <linuxw...@outer-planes.net> > wrote: > > Hello COSE WG, > > The interim meeting today focused on countersignatures, and there was > rough consensus on a proposed plan. The chairs are seeking any > objections for a proposed breakdown to move forward countersignatures. > > 1) The working group will have two documents: rfc8152bis-struct for the > current state of the art, and a separate (still to be written) document > that describes the improved countersignatures (colloquially V2). > -rfc8152bis-struct will include an informative reference to this new > document in order to progress. Please inform the WG if you object to > separating countersignatures into a separate document. > > 2) The current countersignatures algorithm will be removed from > -rfc8152bis-struct, and in its place will be the rationale for > deprecating the "v1" countersignatures; readers will be directed to RFC > 8152 for information on implementing them. Please inform the WG if you > object to dropping "Countersignatures v1" from -rfc8152bis-struct. > > Please respond to this message with your objection to (1) and/or (2) > above. This call expires in approximately one week, on September 2. > Please be sure to respond with objections before then. > > > Thank you, > - Ivaylo and Matthew > COSE WG Chairs
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list COSE@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
