Murray, This change picked up what I missed from Ben's review. For some reason I got totally fixated on the Discuss and completely forgot to look at the comments section. While I was at it I went back to the IESG record to double check that all of the issues raised there were also dealt with. I think that this document should be ready to go.
Jim Ben, My apologies for missing this the last time round. Jim -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 9:42 AM To: Jim Schaad <[email protected]> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-cose-hash-algs-09.txt A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-cose-hash-algs-09.txt has been successfully submitted by Jim Schaad and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-ietf-cose-hash-algs Revision: 09 Title: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE): Hash Algorithms Document date: 2020-09-14 Group: cose Pages: 12 URL: https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-cose-hash-algs-09.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-hash-algs/ Html: https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-cose-hash-algs-09.html Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-cose-hash-algs-09 Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-cose-hash-algs-09 Abstract: The CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE) syntax [I-D.ietf-cose-rfc8152bis-struct] does not define any direct methods for using hash algorithms. There are, however, circumstances where hash algorithms are used, such as indirect signatures where the hash of one or more contents are signed, and X.509 certificate or other object identification by the use of a fingerprint. This document defines a set of hash algorithms that are identified by COSE Algorithm Identifiers. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
