John Mattsson <[email protected]> wrote:
    > Three suggestion regarding certificate compression in the charter.

These changes look fine to me.

    > OLD
    > "A CBOR encoding of the compressed certificate profile defined in RFC 
7925."

    > NEW
    > "A CBOR encoding of the compressed certificate profile defined in RFC 
7925. It is expected that the compression works with a large subset of RFC 7925 
and takes into consideration any updates in 
draft-ietf-uta-tls13-iot-profile-00. The compression may also include other 
important IoT certificate profiles like IEEE 802.11AR."


    > OLD:
    > "This work will be based on draft-mattsson-cose-cbor-cert-compress and 
draft-raza-ace-cbor-certificates. It is expected these documents are to be 
combined into a single document."

    > NEW
    > "This work will be based on draft-mattsson-cose-cbor-cert-compress"

Is this because you've already merged with the other document?


    > ADD
    > "The working group will collaborate and coordinate with other IETF WGs 
such as TLS, UTA, LAKE to understand and validate the
    > requirements and solution."

    > _______________________________________________
    > COSE mailing list
    > [email protected]
    > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose

--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
COSE mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose

Reply via email to