> On 2020-10-31, at 21:56, Martin Duke <[email protected]> wrote: > > I would be happy if it the paragraph in question was rewritten to be clearer, > perhaps using the words in the exchange between me and Michael. Really, > simply replacing the passive voice in the sentence with active pretty much > forces you to be clear about who is doing what.
Like: Certificates obtained from any of these methods MUST still be validated. ➔ Parties that intend to rely on the assertions made by a certificate obtained from any of these methods still need to validate it. ? (Note that I changed the RFC 2119 MUST into a statement of fact, which is orthogonal to the question of who the actor of the validation is.) Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
