Hello COSE WG, This starts a comment period on the proposed recharter for the COSE Working Group. Please provide feedback on the charter, even if you have no objections, to this mailing list and/or to < cose-chairs @ ietf.org >.
The proposed charter is below, and can also be found at < https://github.com/cose-wgCharter >. Please comment on the proposed charter before February 2, 2021. Thank you, - Ivaylo and Matthew COSE WG Chairs ----- # Charter for Working Group CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE, RFC 8152) describes how to create and process signatures, message authentication codes, and encryption using Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR, RFC 7049) for serialization. COSE additionally describes a representation for cryptographic keys. COSE has been picked up and is being used both by a number of groups within the IETF (i.e. ACE, CORE, ANIMA, 6TiSCH and SUIT) as well as outside of the IETF (i.e. W3C and FIDO). There are a number of implementations, both open source and private, now in existence. The specification has advanced to STD status. The COSE working group will deal with two types of documents going forward: 1. Documents that describe the use of cryptographic algorithms in COSE. 2. Documents which describe additional attributes for COSE. The WG will evaluate, and potentially adopt, documents dealing with algorithms which would fit the criteria of being IETF consensus algorithms. Potential candidates would include those algorithms which have been evaluated by the CFRG and algorithms which have gone through a public review and evaluation process such as was done for the NIST SHA-3 algorithms. Potential candidate would not include national standards based algorithms which have not gone through a similar public review process. The WG will produce documents for new attributes only if they are in the list of deliverables below. A re-charter will be required to expand that list. The WG is expected as part of normal processing to review and comment on attributes which are not in charter but are of general public interest. Key management and binding of keys to identities are out of scope for the working group. The COSE WG will not innovate in terms of cryptography. The specification of algorithms in COSE is limited to those in RFCs, active CFRG or IETF WG documents, or algorithms which have been positively reviewed by the CFRG. The working group will coordinate its progress with the ACE, SUIT and CORE working groups to ensure that we are fulfilling the needs of these constituencies to the extent relevant to their work. Other groups may be added to this list as the set of use cases is expanded, in consultation with the responsible Area Director. The WG currently has two deliverables: 1. One or more documents describing the proper use of algorithms. These algorithms must meet the requirements outlined above. 2. A CBOR encoding of the certificate profile defined in RFC 5280. It is expected that the compression works with RFC 7925 and takes into consideration any updates in draft-ietf-uta-tls13-iot-profile-00. The compression may also include other important IoT certificate profiles like IEEE 802.1AR. The main objective is to define a method of compressing current X.509 certificates that meet a specific profile into a smaller format. This compression algorithm is loss-less so they can be expanded and normal X.509 certificate processing used. The data structures used to encode such compressed X.509 certificates are expected to produce a compact encoding for certificate information, and are not necessarily tied specifically to X.509 certificates. Accordingly, a secondary objective is to reuse these data structures to produce a natively signed CBOR certificate encoding; such a structure is relevant in situations where DER parsing and the compression/decompression machinery to convert between CBOR and DER encodings are unnecessary overhead, such as embedded implementations. The possibility of a joint certificate artifact, conveyed in CBOR encoding but including signatures over both the CBOR and DER encodings, may be explored. This work will be based on draft-mattsson-cose-cbor-cert-compress. The working group will collaborate and coordinate with other IETF WGs such as TLS, UTA, LAKE to understand and validate the requirements and solution. ----- _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
