Thanks Thomas.

RFC Editor, please note that this also applies to
draft-ietf-cose-rfc8152bis-struct, in your queue.

-Ben

On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 07:31:11AM -0700, RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8152,
> "CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6487
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Thomas Fossati <[email protected]>
> 
> Section: C.7
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> In order the keys are:
> 
>    o  An EC key with a kid of "[email protected]"
> 
>    o  An EC key with a kid of "[email protected]"
> 
>    o  An EC key with a kid of "[email protected]"
> 
>    o  An EC key with a kid of "11"
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> In order the keys are:
> 
>    o  An EC key with a kid of "[email protected]"
> 
>    o  An EC key with a kid of "11"
> 
>    o  An EC key with a kid of "[email protected]"
> 
>    o  An EC key with a kid of "[email protected]"
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> That, or maybe leave the list as is and remove "In order".
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8152 (draft-ietf-cose-msg-24)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE)
> Publication Date    : July 2017
> Author(s)           : J. Schaad
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : CBOR Object Signing and Encryption
> Area                : Security
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG

_______________________________________________
COSE mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose

Reply via email to