Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-cose-02-00: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-cose/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Not familiar with COSE, but, is "attributes for COSE" a well-understood terminology ? If not mistaken, "i.e." must be followed by a comma (but, hey, English is not my native language, so, can be wrong). In "The WG currently has two deliverables", suggest replace "deliverables" by "work items". The amount of descriptions/restrictions for the CBOR encoding for a certificate compared to nearly no descriptions/restrictions for the other "deliverable" is really surprising. Is there a COSE WG consensus on this second deliverable ? Suggest to move the § starting with "The working group will coordinate its progress " at the end of the charter as it is often the case. _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
