I think this change can be a good improvement, but the existing CDDL is not “wrong”, it is just not expressing all the constraints that are then expressed in prose.
Grüße, Carsten > On 2022-03-31, at 15:48, RFC Errata System <[email protected]> wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8152, > "CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE)". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6909 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Thomas Fossati <[email protected]> > > Section: 3.1 > > Original Text > ------------- > Generic_Headers = ( > ? 1 => int / tstr, ; algorithm identifier > ? 2 => [+label], ; criticality > ? 3 => tstr / int, ; content type > ? 4 => bstr, ; key identifier > ? 5 => bstr, ; IV > ? 6 => bstr ; Partial IV > ) > > Corrected Text > -------------- > Generic_Headers = ( > ? 1 => int / tstr, ; algorithm identifier > ? 2 => [+label], ; criticality > ? 3 => tstr / int, ; content type > ? 4 => bstr, ; key identifier > ? ( 5 => bstr // ; IV > 6 => bstr ) ; Partial IV > ) > > Notes > ----- > Section 3.1 says: "The "Initialization Vector" and "Partial Initialization > Vector" header parameters MUST NOT both be present in the same security > layer." > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC8152 (draft-ietf-cose-msg-24) > -------------------------------------- > Title : CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE) > Publication Date : July 2017 > Author(s) : J. Schaad > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : CBOR Object Signing and Encryption > Area : Security > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > > _______________________________________________ > COSE mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
