Does this not follow the 2 week time period for notification of a BoF?

Thank you,
Kathleen

On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 1:22 PM Ira McDonald <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Ned,
>
> No - Henk meant IETF 113 - this is not a BoF at IETF 114 in July - this is
> a BoF on next Thursday, that was dispatched as such at IETF 113.
>
> Henk - that's lunch hour at ESCAR USA next week - I'll try to join.
>
> Cheers,
> - Ira
>
> *Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)*
>
> *Chair - SAE Trust Anchors and Authentication TF*
> *Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG*
>
> *Co-Chair - TCG Metadata Access Protocol SG*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WGSecretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer
> Working GroupCo-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WGIETF
> Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIBBlue Roof Music / High North
> Inchttp://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
> <http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic>http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
> <http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc>mailto: [email protected]
> <[email protected]>(permanent) PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839
> 906-494-2434*
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 1:15 PM Smith, Ned <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I think you intended IETF114?
>>
>> On 6/10/22, 9:14 AM, "RATS on behalf of Henk Birkholz" <
>> [email protected] on behalf of [email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>     Thu, June 16th, 4pm UTC!
>>
>>     On 10.06.22 18:11, Henk Birkholz wrote:
>>     > Hi SCITT list,
>>     > hi COSE, RATS, and SECDISPATCH lists,
>>     >
>>     > the work proposed under the name "Supply Chain Integrity,
>> Transparency,
>>     > and Trust" (SCITT) has been (sec)dispatched to a BoF at IETF 113.
>> As a
>>     > result, there is a virtual BoF scheduled for next week. It's a non
>> WG
>>     > forming session that focuses on problem statement refinement,
>> initial
>>     > use case(s), and standardization scope.
>>     >
>>     > It's a 2h event scheduled for:
>>     >
>>     > *Tue, June 16th, 4pm UTC*
>>     >
>>     > See the upcoming meetings details here:
>>     >
>>     >>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim-2022-scitt-01/session/scitt
>>     >
>>     >
>>     > A slide deck that is intended to structure the first hour a bit is
>>     > already available. You can find that one here:
>>     >
>>     >>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim-2022-scitt-01/materials/slides-interim-2022-scitt-01-sessa-problem-statement-initial-use-case-standardization-scope-00
>>     >>
>>     >
>>     >
>>     > If you find the time, have a look! We'd be happy about early
>> feedback &
>>     > bashing.
>>     >
>>     > Another opportunity to chime in early is the weekly SCITT meeting
>>     > Mondays 3pm UTC. The next one is taking place this coming Mon, June
>>     > 13th, with a concise agenda announced here:
>>     >
>>     >>
>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/scitt/1LqS90RwTQRTzmBovexeMu5Cx6o/
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >
>>     > Viele Grü0e,
>>     >
>>     > Henk
>>     >
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     RATS mailing list
>>     [email protected]
>>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RATS mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats
>>
> _______________________________________________
> RATS mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats
>


-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen
_______________________________________________
COSE mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose

Reply via email to