On 2022-08-17, at 17:04, Russ Housley <[email protected]> wrote: > > Carsten: > > I want this document to be recognized a Jim's work. Therefore, I have asked > the RFC Editor to drop my name from the author's list. Michael is asking me > to leave it.
Russ, thanks for the clarification; I should have had a look at the actual document. Section 16.2 of RFC 8152 does not include a “change controller” column, which would create the natural place to include a workable email address in Section 5.2. Similar for Section 9.2 of RFC 8949 (a point of contact is only required for FCFS registrations). (See Sections 2.3 and 4.5 of RFC 8126, and some not yet fully documented procedures about then actually creating the entries from RFCs and possibly updating it when email addresses become invalid.) So maybe we should simply provide the point of contact info in Section 5.1, even if it is not required by RFC 8949. I’d say [email protected], with fallback to some SEC area list I can’t find at the moment. Except that info is removed by the RFC editor. Barry: Any ideas how to do this right? Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
