Hi Ilari,
It looks like you agree to the proposals.
Regarding your remarks:
> Bikeshed: I would put those in order kem_id, kdf_id, aead_id, enc.
I used the order that was proposed previously but I am happy to re-order.
>
> Regarding issue#2, the change relates to how the encapsulated_key structure
> is registered in the COSE IANA registry (under COSE header parameters).
>
> Change from:
>
> * Name: encapsulated_key
> * Label: TBD2 (Assumed: -4)
> * Value type: bstr / [any] / { any => any }
> * Value Registry: N/A
> * Description: Encapsulated key for KEM-like algorithms
> To:
>
> * Name: encapsulated_key
> * Label: TBD2 (Assumed: -4)
> * Value type: Array
> * Value Registry: N/A
> * Description: Encapsulated key for KEM-like algorithms
> Having "array", as opposed to some concrete (encapsulated_key?) structure
> there still looks polymorphic.
Happy to put encapsulated_key in there. The COSE IANA registry is a bit
inconsistent in what authors provided.
Ciao
Hannes
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient,
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any
other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any
medium. Thank you.
_______________________________________________
COSE mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
