I support adoption (I am an author). Inline:
On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 12:11 PM Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for this document as well. We should adopt. > > Same question: can we merge tables 3/4 so that the JOSE/COSE allocations > are > in the same place? > I think so, this is similar to how secp256k1 handled things: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8812#section-3.1 > In this document you have placed the examples in an appendix. > I think that they documents should be consistent. I don't really care which > way it occurs. > My preference is for test vectors in appendix, and decoded examples in appropriate sections. > And I guess COSE examples are TBD? > Yes, I am getting better at COSE, I can probably take a stab at generating some now, even with the tags for keys and algs, TBD. > > -- > Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works > -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- *I*LIKE*TRAINS* > > > > _______________________________________________ > COSE mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose > -- *ORIE STEELE* Chief Technical Officer www.transmute.industries <https://www.transmute.industries>
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
