On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 06:43:25PM -0500, Orie Steele wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 4:33 PM AJITOMI Daisuke <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Yes, I believe the JWK and COSE Key Representations for HPKE should be > >> defined together. > > > > > > So, could I understand that you agree to the adoption of this draft into > > the WG document? Or do you think there are things that need to be done > > before adoption? > > > > Yes, the thing that needs to be done is address the use of "alg", in > headers, and keys, consistently. > > In my opinion, this work needs to be done in the COSE HPKE draft, and when > it is done, there will not be a need for a second draft focusing only on > keys.
I do not think this is possible. This would require extending scope of COSE-HPKE draft far beyond its current scope. And it is obvious that the authors are not comfortable doing so. For example, for alg values in JWK, JOSE-HPKE is *hard* blocker. -Ilari _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
