Hi David, Apologies for late response. The registration looks good to me, matching the previous discussion in the WG.
For the actual value of the algorithm identifier I propose to use an integer >= -24 and <= 23 (1-byte CBOR representation) for A128CTR because of its applicability in constrained IoT, and integers outside that interval for the other two algorithms. Thanks, Göran From: David Dong via RT <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, 3 May 2023 at 23:34 To: Cc: Göran Selander <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: [IANA #1271885] expert review for draft-ietf-cose-aes-ctr-and-cbc (cose) Dear Göran, Derek, and Sean (cc: [cose WG]), As the designated experts for the COSE Algorithms registry, can you review the proposed registration in draft-ietf-cose-aes-ctr-and-cbc for us? Please see https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-aes-ctr-and-cbc/ The due date is March 17th, 2023. If this is OK, when the IESG approves the document for publication, we'll make the registration at: https://www.iana.org/assignments/cose/ Unless you ask us to wait for the other reviewers, we’ll act on the first response we receive. With thanks, David Dong IANA Services Specialist
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
