Hi Bormann, I like and support this kind of work. It's great.
If you skim the below and find a principle you think should be in there, > drop me a note (or write a PR! [1]). I think it might be even better if a principle (or a kind of guideline) on the registration of "Capabilities" were included. Best regards, Daisuke 2023年7月24日(月) 7:54 Carsten Bormann <[email protected]>: > Several of the recent discussions on this mailing list were about how we > should operate the registries created by COSE. As the draft below says, > "Section 11.6 of RFC 9052 gives the Designated Experts for these registries > considerable leeway”. > > So I started to write up some “registration principles”, both as a memory > aid for the experts, and as a way for registrants to divine what the > experts are likely to decide. > > Of course, I didn’t get very far with so many things going on. > If you skim the below and find a principle you think should be in there, > drop me a note (or write a PR! [1]). > This is still a trial balloon, but it already could help us discuss > specific registrations and how they fulfill the principles or not. > > Maybe we can have a very short mention of this draft in the COSE meeting > tomorrow. > > Grüße, Carsten > > > [1]: https://github.com/cabo/cose-regprin > > > On 2023-07-24, at 00:37, [email protected] wrote: > > > > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > > directories. > > > > Title : COSE: On Registration Principles > > Author : Carsten Bormann > > Filename : draft-bormann-cose-registration-principles-00.txt > > Pages : 7 > > Date : 2023-07-23 > > > > Abstract: > > COSE (STD 96, RFC 9052 and RFC 9338) defines a number of registries > > that allow registrants to exercise the numerous extension points > > defined in COSE. Section 11.6 of RFC 9052 gives the Designated > > Experts for these registries considerable leeway in deciding about > > registration requests. > > > > The present document is intended to collect information that has been > > the basis for initial population of and further registration in these > > registries. It is intended to be shaped by the Designated Experts > > and serve them as a collective memorandum and a checklist. As a > > secondary function, it is also intended to help registrants create > > registrations that are acceptable to the Designated Experts. > > > > > > // Revision -00 of this draft is an early skeleton that should allow > > // us to decide whether such a collection of information is useful > > // and whether we want to flesh out this document. > > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bormann-cose-registration-principles/ > > > > There is also an HTML version available at: > > > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-bormann-cose-registration-principles-00.html > > > > Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org: > :internet-drafts > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > I-D-Announce mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce > > Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html > > or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt > > _______________________________________________ > COSE mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose >
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
