Göran, 

I missed this feedback earlier, so thanks. There is now a PR for the specific 
change to handle the RFC 9174 registrations.

While editing I also discovered Issue #121 
<https://github.com/cose-wg/CBOR-certificates/issues/121>  but don’t plan on 
following up on that one with any PR.

 

From: Göran Selander <[email protected]> 
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2023 6:15 PM
To: Sipos, Brian J. <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: [EXT] Re: C509 additional compressed SAN form

 

Hi Brian, 

 

This sounds like a reasonable request, I made an issue:

https://github.com/cose-wg/CBOR-certificates/issues/120

 

Please provide a PR or a detailed proposal for the update.

 

Thanks,

Göran

 

From: Sipos, Brian J. < <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, 25 July 2023 at 20:36
To:  <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] < <mailto:[email protected]> 
[email protected]>,  <mailto:[email protected]> 
[email protected] < 
<mailto:[email protected]> 
[email protected]>
Subject: C509 additional compressed SAN form

initial code point in the “C509 General Names Registry” for the Bundle Protocol 
Endpoint ID? This otherName form was allocated in RFC 9174 [2] and has an 
existing compressed CBOR form defined in RFC 9171 [3] (with a CDDL symbol 
“eid-structure” defined in that document). I don’t think there would be much 
more work than referencing those existing otherName OID and the CDDL symbol (or 
simply copy-pasting that symbol definition), or  I could propose specific text 
to fit in Figure 13 if desired.

 

I think allocating in the initial table would be easier than allocating a 
single code point in a separate document, but I don’t want to interrupt the 
current document flow. Any thoughts are welcome, thanks!

Brian S.

 

[1] 
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert-06.html#section-11.8

[2] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9174.html#appendix-B

[3] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9171#section-4.2.5.1-6

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
COSE mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose

Reply via email to