Thomas Fossati <[email protected]> wrote: > For example, we use UCCS as a "sidecar token" that is coupled (using an > EAT collection [2] rather than a DEB) to a "main," signed EAT that > contains the UCCS's digest in one of its claims. Note that this is not > in contradiction with EAT, in fact §4.2.18.2 of -21 has:
I think that it would be simpler for reviewers if this "sidecar" use of UCCS was discussed within the EAT claim that contains the digest. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
