On 2023-11-07, at 13:45, Mike Ounsworth <[email protected]> wrote: > > could notAfter be made optional in C509?
If that seems to far a step, let’s just use
false
for
99991231235959Z
Grüße, Carsten
_______________________________________________
COSE mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
