I also approve, thank you Carsten for suggesting text and Mike for including it.
Francesca From: Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, 29 November 2023 at 14:43 To: Michael Jones <[email protected]> Cc: Francesca Palombini <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, lgl island-resort.com <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [COSE] [IANA #1284212] expert review for draft-ietf-cose-cwt-claims-in-headers (cose) IANA: I approve the registration in Section 5 of draft-ietf-cose-cwt-claims-in-headers-10, with the suggested code point. Grüße, Carsten > On Nov 29, 2023, at 14:33, Michael Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for your detailed review and resulting pull request, Carsten. I've > reviewed and merged it and published -10 incorporating it. See > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-cwt-claims-in-headers/. > > If you and/or Francesca could approve the IANA registration today, that would > prepare us for the telechat on the 30th. > > Thanks again! > -- Mike > > -----Original Message----- > From: Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2023 2:52 AM > To: Michael Jones <[email protected]> > Cc: Francesca Palombini <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; lgl island-resort.com <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [COSE] [IANA #1284212] expert review for > draft-ietf-cose-cwt-claims-in-headers (cose) > > Hi Mike, > > the text of -09 is not yet in the repository, so I made a pull request to the > state of main in > https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=31323334-501d5122-313273af-454445555731-8b3cc1ce68bdf545&q=1&e=cf04d0e4-66e7-4da8-b08a-1a7aa98b68ac&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Ftplooker%2Fdraft-ietf-cose-cwt-claims-in-headers: > > https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=31323334-501d5122-313273af-454445555731-b704daf4cfaf7bac&q=1&e=cf04d0e4-66e7-4da8-b08a-1a7aa98b68ac&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Ftplooker%2Fdraft-ietf-cose-cwt-claims-in-headers%2Fpull%2F14 > > This PR avoids the nebulous term profile introduced in -09. > It also makes the requirement for indicating the intended interpretation a > protocol requirement, instead of burying it in the security considerations. > It is explicit that it is the security (integrity protection and > authentication) of the *combination* of the CWT Claims header parameter and > of the method of conveying the intended interpretation governs the allowable > usage of the interpreted information. > > Grüße, Carsten > > >> On 2023-11-14, at 19:09, Michael Jones <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Francesca, >> >> Now that we have an agreed-upon strategy in which the lake-edhoc and >> draft-ietf-cose-cwt-claims-in-headers header parameters are distinct, can >> you please reply-all updating your review to approve the registration? That >> should put us in good shape for the November 30th Telechat. >> >> FYI, Hannes replied updating his IoTDir review saying that the spec is ready >> - which he did in response to the security considerations updates we made >> together in >> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cose-cwt-claims-in-headers-09.html. >> >> Carsten, in response to your feedback, -09 now also says that the profile >> used defines the semantics for the CWT claims used. >> >> Thanks both, >> -- Mike >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: COSE <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Michael Jones >> Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2023 3:54 AM >> To: Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> >> Cc: Francesca Palombini <[email protected]>; >> [email protected]; lgl island-resort.com <[email protected]>; >> [email protected]; [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [COSE] [IANA #1284212] expert review for >> draft-ietf-cose-cwt-claims-in-headers (cose) >> >> I created >> https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=31323334-501d5122-313273af-454445555731-fbc59cb147aab329&q=1&e=cf04d0e4-66e7-4da8-b08a-1a7aa98b68ac&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Ftplooker%2Fdraft-ietf-cose-cwt-claims-in-headers%2Fpull%2F13 >> to describe the non-CBOR payload use case in response to Hannes' IotDir >> review. It also says that profiles define the semantics of the claims used, >> in response to further feedback from Carsten. >> >> Reviews requested! >> >> -- Mike >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2023 11:46 AM >> To: Michael Jones <[email protected]> >> Cc: Francesca Palombini <[email protected]>; >> [email protected]; lgl island-resort.com <[email protected]>; >> [email protected]; [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [COSE] [IANA #1284212] expert review for >> draft-ietf-cose-cwt-claims-in-headers (cose) >> >> Hi Mike, >> >> I was planning to send you (a PR with) some clarifying editorial changes >> first. >> The week is quite full... >> >> Grüße, Carsten >> >> >>> On Nov 8, 2023, at 00:29, Michael Jones <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> As designated experts, can you please reply-all saying that you approve of >>> the registration proposed in >>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cose-cwt-claims-in-headers-08.html >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> COSE mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose > > _______________________________________________ > COSE mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
